Political Bias in Historical Writing
₡16.900
₡0
Political Bias in Historical Writing
John-Paul Wilson
Political Bias in Historical Writing
Political Bias in Historical Writing
John-Paul Wilson
Descripción
The first step to writing a historical narrative is to understand the current state of knowledge of a given subject as it has been developed by other historians. From this understanding, one must then develop a methodology from which further research can be conducted to fill gaps and resolve inconsistencies within the existing body of knowledge. The present author began to develop a historical account of the 1979 Sandinista Revolution in Nicaragua and its development in the following decade. In that study, it became clear that great discrepancies and inconsistencies existed in the record of historical analysis including many large contradictory conclusions. Many such discrepancies were resolved in the author's prior research but it became clear that a systematic approach to quantitatively analyze the source of these contradictions was needed. In the present research, the author has developed both a theoretical framework for understanding the source of these contradictions and quantitative methods of content analysis to examine the numerous analytical works written by North American authors about the Sandinistas throughout the 1980s. Using this framework and results of content analysis, linear studies along specific topic lines examine specific dynamic variables of Nicaraguan history in relation to the revolution, beginning a process toward the development of a more consistent history.
Detalles
Formato | Tapa suave |
Número de Páginas | 510 |
Lenguaje | Inglés |
Editorial | Xlibris |
Fecha de Publicación | 2009-08-07 |
Dimensiones | 9.0" x 6.0" x 1.14" pulgadas |
Letra Grande | No |
Con Ilustraciones | Si |
Temas | América Latina |
Descripción
The first step to writing a historical narrative is to understand the current state of knowledge of a given subject as it has been developed by other historians. From this understanding, one must then develop a methodology from which further research can be conducted to fill gaps and resolve inconsistencies within the existing body of knowledge. The present author began to develop a historical account of the 1979 Sandinista Revolution in Nicaragua and its development in the following decade. In that study, it became clear that great discrepancies and inconsistencies existed in the record of historical analysis including many large contradictory conclusions. Many such discrepancies were resolved in the author's prior research but it became clear that a systematic approach to quantitatively analyze the source of these contradictions was needed. In the present research, the author has developed both a theoretical framework for understanding the source of these contradictions and quantitative methods of content analysis to examine the numerous analytical works written by North American authors about the Sandinistas throughout the 1980s. Using this framework and results of content analysis, linear studies along specific topic lines examine specific dynamic variables of Nicaraguan history in relation to the revolution, beginning a process toward the development of a more consistent history.
Detalles
Formato | Tapa dura |
Número de Páginas | 510 |
Lenguaje | Inglés |
Editorial | Xlibris |
Fecha de Publicación | 2009-08-07 |
Dimensiones | 9.0" x 6.0" x 1.25" pulgadas |
Letra Grande | No |
Con Ilustraciones | Si |
Temas | América Latina |
Garantía & Otros
Garantía: | 30 dias por defectos de fabrica |
Peso: | 0.739 kg |
SKU: | 9781425715472 |
Publicado en Unimart.com: | 01/11/23 |
Feedback: |
¿Viste un precio más bajo?
Queremos saber.
×
Informános Sobre un Mejor Precio Political Bias in Historical Writing ¿Viste un precio más bajo? Queremos saber. Aunque no podemos igualar todos los precios, usaremos tus comentarios para asegurarnos que nuestros precios sean competitivos. ¿Adonde viste un precio más bajo? |
Categorías relacionadas:
×